Gay-Ireland.com

www.Gay-Ireland.com - Gay Ireland online

need cinema times for Ireland Dublin - Movies.ie

Gay Ireland Red Menu

More Info

 

 

Recent Reviews

 

Will and Grace

syphilis

Harry Potter

www.Gay-Ireland.com

   

BlackStar Home

Spiderman - Save 20%

Wizard of Oz

Gay porn Videos + DVD's

Monsters Inc


Browse XXX
Vids + DVD's
  

 

A Beautiful Mind 

Beautiful mind - Russell Crowe - Gay Ireland Movie Review

Directed by Ron Howard. 
Stars - Russell Crowe, Jennifer Connelly


Reviewers rating : 7 out of 10

 

There are people who are good at sums and then there are people who actually like mathematics! This is a film about the latter. A somewhat embellished true story of the Nobel prize winning American mathematician John Nash. So why make a film about it, and a possible Oscar award winning film at that?
 
No doubt the answer lies in the acting of Russell Crowe and the subject matter; it being, not maths, but the life and times of a paranoid-schizophrenic and how he overcame the condition in so far as it could. The film kicks off at Princeton University USA where John Nash (Crowe) has just arrived on winning the second half of a scholarship in the early fifties. The fifties and sixties were at the height of the 'Cold War' between American and Russia which forms a broad background for Nash's involvement, working for the government at the Pentagon. They recognised Nash's skills in recognising code patterns in use by Soviet forces.
 
Its well documented that exceptional geniuses in any area, are deficient in some parts of social skills and interactions with people, and right from the start this provided much amusement for the audience. He tended to cut down situations and occasions to the basic core statements - relying on the essence of fact rather than the accompanying padding. This stemmed from his years of mathematical training and complex problem solving. One particular instance, his friends goaded him into approaching a girl at a bar, which he did with some relish but killed the situation when he talked about sex as "being nothing but the exchange of body fluids, so lets get down to it" This early rejection was to haunt him throughout the film, and so he was more than careful when approached by one of his more brighter female students Alicia (Connelly).
 
The film plots John Nash's rise to fame at Princeton university, after a period of non-productivity. He is at one time threatened with expulsion until he comes up with a new thesis which effectively rubbishes much of Adam Smiths work on economic theory published earlier. This and other work lead to his scholarship at M.I.T and the subsequent hiring by the Pentagon, but its more than a film about Nash and his genius. As they say, there is a fly in every ointment, and in this case it was schizophrenia and this is what the film is really about. Its not an easy topic to show on screen, never mind make a feature length film about, so it wasn't until an hour and fifteen minutes of run time had elapsed that this was truly revealed. Up to this we had tolerated Nash's idiosyncrasies as that of coming from a maths nerd!
 
His subsequent marriage to Alicia did prompt questions from me as to her authenticity as hubby was at that time working for the Pentagon, but this proved to be groundless. I cant really tell anymore without giving the plot away completely, but his demise is quite saddening, while at the same time giving a valuable insight into the world of a paranoid-schizophrenic. Good direction by Ron Howard leaves the audience guessing who is right and who is wrong - where does  your loyalty lie?
 
Very little was known in the 60's about the condition and the range of treatments available were limited and quite disturbing - the after effects leaving Nash, a sometimes broken man not to mention his wife, who questioned her own sanity and safety.
 
The film ends with the awarding of the Nobel laureate  in 1994 to John Nash for his work on game theory and his gradual acceptance of his condition, which never did go away. Your attention is kept to the very end.


Reviewed by Tomer Avshalom 

March 2002